For
those familiar with last
year's Mac mini, what you're peering at above isn't likely to strike you as jarring.
Heck, it may even seem somewhat vanilla at this point. In truth, Apple did
exceedingly little in terms of design changes with the mid 2011 Mac mini, but
given the relatively recent cosmetic overhaul, it's not like we were genuinely
expecting anything above a top-to-bottom spec bump. And that, friends, is
exactly what we've received. The mini remains quite the curious beast in
Cupertino's line -- it's thealmost-HTPC that living
room junkies are longing for, yet it's still a country mile from being the
headless mid-tower that Apple steadfastly refuses to build. It's hardly a PC
for the simpleton (given that it's on you to hunt down a mouse, keyboard and
monitor), and it's actually taking a giant leap backwards on one particularly
important front. Care to hear more? You'll find our full review just past the
break.
Hardware and design
Make
no mistake about it -- the mini is just gorgeous to look at. As with the prior
model, this 2.7 pound slab of aluminum looks nicer than its price tag
indicates, and it honestly feels more like a decoration than a computer. It's
sized at 7.7 x 7.7 x 1.4 inches, exactly the same as its predecessor, and
outside of the chromed Apple logo on the top, a matte black strip of ports on
the rear and a similarly hued lid on the bottom, it's a clean sweep of brushed
silver. It'll sit nicely on its edge for those contemplating a vertical
installation, but the protruding lid on the bottom makes it a little less
elegant for those applications.
Speaking of the
rear, the dozen connectors found there aren't cosmetically different than those
on the last build. From left to right, you'll find an AC input, gigabit
Ethernet jack, FireWire 800 port, HDMI (full-size), Thunderbolt, four USB 2.0
sockets, an SDXC slot, an audio input and a 3.5mm headphone port. Funny enough,
last year's DisplayPort socket looks identical to this year's Thunderbolt
connector, and not surprisingly, DisplayPort monitors and peripherals will
happily fit themselves in with no adapters needed. For what it's worth, Apple
does include an HDMI-to-DVI adapter, but oddly, no Thunderbolt dongle. Sure, we
know those cables are laced
in gold,
but what better way to encourage adoption of a new I/O port than to toss in an
appendage for newcomers? Even a DisplayPort / Thunderbolt-to-HDMI or DVI cable
would've been greatly appreciated -- making it simple to hook up dual displays
right from the get-go would have seriously tickled our fancy.
Tinkerers
are bound to love that bottom lid... and then grow frustrated by what's
underneath; a simple twist reveals a WiFi module, cooling fan, two SODIMM slots
and plenty of other, not-easily-accessible components. Our test unit came with
a pair of 1GB memory modules, but even the greenest DIYer could swap those out
with more sizable ones -- a couple of snaps and a tug is all it took.
Unfortunately, we're still miffed at Apple's decision to keep the HDD away from
a user's fingertips. If we had our druthers, the RAM wouldn't be the only thing
that's just a few clips away, but alas, we're stuck with what we've got.
We shouldn't have
to chide Intel and Apple (and whoever else wants to claim responsibility) for
not having USB 3.0 on Macs in the year 2011, but regretfully, we are. A
foursome of USB 2.0 ports are cute, but when sub-$400 netbooks are boasting
SuperSpeed USB ports... well, let's just say it's about time Apple took notice.
Unfortunately, Steve Jobs still seems to think that the newest iteration of the
world's most popular port isn't going anywhere fast, so we're apt to see
Thunderbolt pushed as the true USB 2.0 replacement. That doesn't mean we have
to like it, though.
Given
that it's the only new port onboard, it's worth mentioning that Thunderbolt is
a fantastic addition to the array. The ability to daisy-chain monitors and
peripherals off of it enables the bantam desktop to play grown-up in a few key
ways. It'll handle vast display resolutions (up to 2,560 x 1,600; the HDMI
socket tops out at 1,920 x 1,200) and outlandish storage solutions, and thanks
to the revised CPU, it can more easily handle 'em with poise (more on that in a
bit). It's also worth pointing out that the power supply is still internalized
(huzzah!), leaving you with nary a power brick to fiddle with. Let's all
breathe a simultaneous sigh of relief, cool?
Performance
We
tested out the base mini -- a $599 rig with a 2.3GHz dual-core Core i5, 2GB of
1333MHz DDR3 memory, a 500GB (5,400RPM) hard drive and Intel's HD Graphics 3000
processor with 288MB of DDR3 SDRAM, which is shared with main memory. All
things considered, that's a halfway decent spread for an MSRP that's $100 less
than the base model of 2010, but alas, there's no optical drive to pay for,
either. Whisking about Lion and handling mundane tasks (we're looking at you,
Office) was a breeze, though we confess to getting a little impatient when
waiting for heavier applications to load for the first time. Bootup routinely
took right around 45 seconds from off to usable, and there's no question that
an SSD swap would do wonders for the general
snappiness of the system.
We
also noticed a bit of slowdown after having Photoshop, Word, Firefox, Chrome,
TweetDeck and Lightroom open for around three hours. We're pinning that on the
lowly 2GB of RAM; granted, we were intentionally pushing it, but those hoping
to get creative work done on a mini will certainly want to invest in a few more
gigs (and a speedier disk drive). Thankfully, 2GB proved plenty when playing
back 1080p files, YouTube HD clips and anything we could find in Boxee / Hulu.
On the gaming
front, the results were downright impressive. We fired up Half Life 2: Episode 2, turned the details to
"High" and cranked the resolution to 1,920 x 1,200 to natively fill
our 24-inch panel. The result? A consistent 31 frames per second. Granted, that
title isn't exactly the newest in the stack, but this at least confirms that
light-duty gaming with your favorites from yesteryear is indeed possible.
Turning to XBench and Geekbench -- staples in the world of OS X benchmarking --
we found similarly impressive stats. This particular system scored 291.21
(overall) / 228.84 (CPU) / 400.30 (Thread Test) on the former, while notching
5,919 on the latter. For comparison's sake, the mid 2010 Mac mini scored 3385
on Geekbench, proving that the Core i5-infused newcomer is leaps and bounds
more powerful in terms of raw number crunching.
Wrap-up
It's
not often that Apple products take a turn for the worse when a new revision
comes out, but there's no question that the design of 2010's mini is superior
to the design of this guy. Sure, the revised edition is a heck of a lot more
powerful and $100 cheaper, but it's in the same infelicitous spot that it's
always been in: by the time you invest in a halfway decent keyboard, mouse and
monitor, you're pushing $850+ for a mid-level machine with a sluggish hard
drive, the bare minimum amount of RAM that we'd recommend for Lion, no USB 3.0
and no optical drive. For whatever reason, Apple's made the new mini even lessuseful than the last, and while a Benjamin off
the sticker is appreciated, it hardly puts it in a new class in terms of value.
On the upside, OS X
Lion is a superbly polished operating system, and the mini
itself is easily the most stunning SFF PC on the market today. It's also eerily
quiet, power efficient and cool, and it's everything the average college
student or studio apartment dweller needs. Handling 1080p multimedia, basic
video / photo editing and even gaming is no problem, but we just can't get over
the paradoxes here. Apple dumbs down the back panel so the DIYers among us can't
access the hard drive, but selling a computer without three essential
peripherals (monitor, keyboard and mouse) ensures that the target market will
be one that's at least remotely familiar with technobabble.
In isolation, the Mac mini is a fine computer.
It's quick on its feet, and it's happy both beside your TV or in the office. As
with all Macs, there's an elusive premium that comes with the overall software
experience, and those placing a high value on OS X and the bundled iLife suite
may find the compromises here acceptable. But imagining how stellar this bundle
of joy could have been with a Blu-ray drive (orany drive) is an impossible vision to shake. Perhaps
it's just getting more difficult to logically recommend a Mac desktop,
particularly one that's underpowered for serious AV work and near impossible to
upgrade. Apple has fine-tuned its laptop options in such a way that makes the
revamped mini look underwhelming -- grandiose thoughts of an entry-level
MacBook Air docked to a (reasonably priced) 27-inch
Thunderbolt Display continue to find their way into our brains.
If you're still
fixated on the beauty here, our honest recommendation is to pick up last year's
model as it inevitably drops in price (and in turn, increases in value). We've
been looking long and hard for an ideal use-case for this guy, and sadly, we've
yet to find it.